Permian boom collides with New Mexico governor’s climate-change push
By Rachel Adams-Heard on 8/26/
NEW YORK (Bloomberg) – Diana Cerny has an oil boom to thank for the packed tables at her restaurant in Carlsbad, New Mexico.
Gushing shale production has brought boot-clad workers from all over the world to this Permian basin city less than an hour north of the Texas border. White F-150s filled the parking lot of the Pecos River Cafe on a recent morning after a light rain lifted the smell of concrete cooked by days of triple-digit heat.
Like a broad swath of West Texas, this sage-covered corner of New Mexico sits atop America’s fastest-growing oilfield. On the Texas side, oil and gas producers can drill and frack with relatively few bureaucratic hurdles. In New Mexico, 90% of Permian production takes place on lands owned by federal or state government, meaning companies need additional approvals from either the U.S. Bureau of Land Management or the state’s Land Office and Oil Conservation Division.
That sets up a classic test in a state that turned politically blue this year. New Mexico has to decide how far it’s willing to go with a proposed rule to limit methane emissions, a key part of the new Democratic governor’s efforts to fight climate change. She must balance concern for the environment with the possibility that stricter regulation could tap the brakes on accelerating production that, thanks to royalties and taxes, funds nearly half the state budget. Already, some drillers expect slower growth in Permian output.
Cerny knows where she stands. Drilling “is good for the economy, it’s good for Carlsbad.” She said she worries that tighter rules could send companies packing across the border to Texas.
It’s a topic getting special attention on this hot August morning. A 10-minute drive from the cafe, outside a sand-colored event center, a line is forming for a public meeting to discuss the proposed rule.
“We don’t want all these workers to leave,” said Rosemary Madsen, 64, a bartender at the Stevens Inn off U.S. Route 285, Carlsbad’s main drag. She’s standing in line with Kerri Crawford, a waitress there, who’s holding a bright green sign that reads: “We won’t let you plug our HOLES!!”
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, a former congresswoman who took office this year, is spearheading one of the country’s most aggressive plans to combat climate change: a move to 100% carbon-free power generation in 25 years. Now she’s targeting methane, the main component of natural gas and a greenhouse gas that’s far more potent than carbon dioxide.
Lujan Grisham’s push comes as the Trump administration readies a plan to end direct federal regulation of methane leaks, even as some energy companies insist they don’t want the relief.
The governor is balancing her concern over the catastrophic effects of climate change with the state’s extraordinary dependence on oil and gas. Soaring Permian production was in large part responsible for the state’s budget surplus last year. Output from the shale play, the world’s biggest, is projected to hit a record in September. At the current rate, the basin will soon catch up with Iraq, OPEC’s largest producer after Saudi Arabia.
“It’s a juxtaposition for sure,” Lujan Grisham said while sipping coffee on a microsuede couch in the state’s capitol in Santa Fe. “I think the trap for too many elected individuals around the country is that they’re asked by some constituent group to pick one, and I’ve said New Mexico is going to pick every single opportunity and then be responsible at the same time.”
Lujan Grisham and other state officials are adamant that they’re not trying to stifle the industry.
“It’s not about a ban on fracking, a moratorium on drilling, a stopping of oil and gas production at all,” Jim Kenney, secretary of New Mexico’s Environment Department, told the Carlsbad meeting.
Companies themselves haven’t said much on the possible changes, probably because so little is known about what they’ll entail. To work out the details, the state is setting up a panel that will include representatives from both environmental and industry groups. No date has been set for a resolution.
The New Mexico Oil and Gas Association said it’s generally been pleased with how the preliminary talks have gone.
“The governor has been extremely collaborative with industry,” said spokesman Robert McEntyre. “We feel that the conversations have been productive.”
New Mexico is hot right now. Producers that tapped their acreage in more developed fields have moved into the Delaware Basin, a sub-play within the Permian that stretches across far west Texas and into Eddy and Lea counties in New Mexico. “The production is better here than in Texas,” said Justin Mitchell, who works for an oilfield contractor. “But the oversight that they have here is such a pain in the ass. Every minute they make it a little harder.”
The current state of the natural gas market is making the methane problem trickier. U.S. prices are at their lowest seasonal levels in two decades, with local prices in the Permian sometimes going negative due to a lack of pipeline capacity. That’s forcing some producers to occasionally shut in oil production to avoid having to find someplace to put the associated gas, according to Chris Walls, a petroleum engineer at the BLM’s Carlsbad office. Far more common is flaring, when oil producers burn off gas to get rid of excess fuel. It’s a practice in full view of Route 285 outside Carlsbad, where flames dot either side of the road. Flaring is actually more environmentally sound than the alternative — venting, in which methane is released directly into the air. But unlit flares can combine with pipeline leaks and tank hatches accidentally left open to put methane in the air. While the link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change is clear, researchers say they don’t know the direct health effects of high exposure to methane. What has been shown is the smog-forming pollutants often found alongside methane emissions, including VOCs, or volatile organic compounds, can lead to symptoms including headaches and nasal irritation.
Concerns are compounded by the fact that in Lea County, 68% of children under 5 live within a mile of a well site, according to the Environmental Defense Fund. In Eddy County, it’s 80%.
Penny Aucoin, a former school bus driver, attributes her 17-year-old son’s chronic nosebleeds to two oil wells across the street from their house.
“I’m afraid that when the oil and gas goes away, when things are done, this town is going to be a ghost town,” Aucoin said. “And everything is going to be destroyed.”
At the Pecos River Café, where a half-dozen waitresses in maroon polos are topping off coffee and taking orders for breakfast burritos, owner Diana Cerny said she’s not too worried about the boom’s effect on the environment.
“Most people are OK with the fact that it’s bringing jobs and income to our city,” she said. “Everything is busy.”
