District judge’s decision upheld for client obeying release restrictions

SANTA FE, NM — The state Supreme Court on Friday affirmed a 2nd Judicial District Court
judge’s ruling allowing a teenager accused of multiple home burglaries to await trial under strict
conditions of release on house arrest.

The Second Judicial District Attorney’s Office asked the court to reconsider the pretrial
detention of Jesse Mascareno-Haidle, 19, after failing twice to convince two judges to hold him
in jail pending his trial. The prosecutor’s office claims that Mr. Mascareno-Haidle is a suspect in
around 80 burglaries, but has only charged him with three alleged incidents.

“Every district court judge who has looked at this case and seen the evidence presented has
agreed that Jesse can safely stay in the community while he awaits his trial,” said attorney Noah
Gelb. “Under the state and federal constitutions, Jesse is presumed innocent. He hasn’t gone to
trial yet. This case shows that judges can make decisions that protect the community and
safeguard individual liberty.”

A constitutional amendment adopted by voters in 2016 allows prosecutors to attempt to detain a
defendant charged with a felony if prosecutors can prove the person is dangerous to the
community or others and that no conditions of release can preserve safety. District judges in
Albuquerque grant about 50% of the prosecutor requests for pretrial detention — and last year
the DA’s Office later declined to even prosecute 20% of those cases. Recidivism rates for people
who have been released are very low, especially for violent crime. A UNM Institute of Social
Research study found that more than 4 out of 5 defendants were not arrested for a crime while on
pretrial release and 96% percent were not accused of a violent crime. Of all 6,392 defendants
released during the time of this study, only 12 were arrested for a first-degree felony during their
release period.

While judges cannot be expected to predict the future 100% of the time, the system we have is
intentionally flexible so that we balance public safety risks against the serious harm done by
incarcerating innocent or non-dangerous New Mexicans based on unproved accusations.